what a true love

what a true love

Selasa, 21 Desember 2010

Learning and Teaching Information Technology Computer Skills in Context

Learning and Teaching Information Technology 
Computer Skills in Context by Michael B. Eisenberg and Doug Johnson 
There is clear and widespread agreement among the public and educators that all students need to be proficient computer users or "computer literate." However, while districts are spending a great deal of money on technology, there seems to be only a vague notion of what computer literacy really means. Can the student who operates a computer well enough to play a game, send e-mail or surf the Web be considered computer literate? Will a student who uses computers in school only for running tutorials or an integrated learning system have the skills necessary to survive in our society? Will the ability to do basic word processing be sufficient for students entering the workplace or post-secondary education? 
Clearly not. In too many schools, teachers and students still use computers only as the equivalent of expensive flash cards, electronic worksheets, or as little more than a typewriter. The productivity side of computer use in the general content area curriculum is neglected or grossly underdeveloped (Moursund, 1995). 
Recent publications by educational associations are advocating for a more meaningful use of technology in schools (ISTE, 2000). Educational technologists are clearly describing what students should know and be able to do with technology. They are advocating integrating computer skills into the content areas, proclaiming that computer skills should not be taught in isolation and that separate "computer classes" do not really help students learn to apply computer skills in meaningful ways. There is increasing recognition that the end result of computer literacy is not knowing how to operate computers, but to use technology as a tool for organization, communication, research, and problem solving. This is an important shift in approach and emphasis. 
Moving from teaching isolated technology skills to an integrated approach is an important step that takes a great deal of planning and effort. Fortunately, we have a model for doing so. Over the past 25 years, library media professionals have worked hard to move from teaching isolated "library skills" to teaching integrated "information skills." They found that information skills can be integrated effectively when the skills (1) directly relate to the content area curriculum and to classroom assignments, and (2) are tied together in a logical and systematic information process model. 
Schools seeking to move from isolated information technology skills instruction will also need to focus on both of these requirements. Successful integrated information skills programs are designed around collaborative projects jointly planned and taught by teachers and library media professionals. Information technology skills instruction can and should be imbedded in such a curriculum. Library media specialists, computer teachers, and classroom teachers need to work together to develop units and lessons that will include both technology skills, information skills, and content-area curriculum outcomes. 
A meaningful, unified information technology literacy curriculum must be more than a "laundry list" of isolated skills, such as knowing the parts of the computer, writing drafts and final products with a word processor, and searching for information using the World Wide Web. 
While these specific skills are important for students to learn, the "laundry list" approach does not provide an adequate model for students to transfer and apply skills from situation to situation. These curricula address the "how" of computer use, but rarely the "when" or "why." Students may learn isolated skills and tools, but they would still lack an understanding of how those various skills fit together to solve problems and complete tasks. Students need to be able to use computers and other technologies flexibly, creatively and purposefully. All learners should be able to recognize what they need to accomplish, determine whether a computer will help them to do so, and then be able to use the computer as part of the process of accomplishing their task. Individual computer skills take on a new meaning when they are integrated within this type of information problem-solving process, and students develop true "information technology literacy" because they have genuinely applied various information technology skills as part of the learning process. 
The curriculum outlined on pages 2-3 of this ERIC Digest, "Technology Skills for Information Problem Solving," demonstrates how technology literacy skills can fit within an information literacy skills context (American Association of School Librarians, 1998). The baseline information literacy context is the Big6 process (see sidebar and Eisenberg & Berkowitz, 1988, 1992, 1999, 2000). The various technology skills are adapted from the International Society for Technology in Education's National Educational Technology Standards for Students (2000) and the Mankato Schools Information Literacy Curriculum Guideline. Students might reasonably be expected to authentically demonstrate these basic computer skills before graduation. 
Some technology literacy competencies that may be relevant in some situations include: (1) knowing the basic operation, terminology, and maintenance of equipment, (2) knowing how to use computer-assisted instructional programs, (3) having knowledge of the impact of technology on careers, society, and culture (as a direct instructional objective), and (4) computer programming. 
Defining and describing technology skills is only a first step in assuring all our children become proficient information and technology users. A teacher-supported scope and sequence of skills, well designed projects, and effective assessments are also critical. Equally essential is collaboration among classroom teachers, teacher librarians, and technology teachers in order to present students with a unified and integrated approach to ensure that all children master the skills they will need to thrive in an information rich future (Eisenberg & Lowe, 1999). 
REFERENCES 
American Association of School Librarians. (1995). Information literacy: A position paper on information problem solving. Emergency Librarian, 23 (2), 20-23. (EJ514998). 
American Association of School Librarians. (1998). Information literacy standards for student learning. Chicago: American Library Association. 
American Association of School Librarians & Association for Educational Communications and Technology. (1998). Information power: Building partnerships for learning. Chicago: American Library Association. 
American Library Association. (2000). Information literacy community partnerships toolkit. Available online: http://library.austin.cc.tx.us/staff/lnavarro/communitypartnerships/toolkit.html 
Association of College and Research Libraries. (2000). Information literacy competency standards for higher education. Available online: http://www.ala.org/acrl/ilintro.html 
Bawden,D. (2001). Information and digital literacies: A review of concepts. Journal of Documentation, 57 (2), 218-59. (EJ632998). 
The Big6 skills information problem-solving approach. [Online]. Available: http://www.big6.com 
Bruce, C. S. (1997). Seven faces of information literacy. Blackwood, South Australia: Auslib Press. 
Bruce, C. S. (1997). The seven faces of information literacy in higher education. Available online: http://www2.fit.qut.edu.au/InfoSys/bruce/inflit/faces/faces1.htm 
California Media and Library Educators Association Staff. (1993). From library skills to information literacy: A handbook for the 21st century. Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited, Inc. 
Committee on Information Technology Literacy, National Research Council. (1999). Being fluent with information technology. Available online:http://www.nap.edu/books/030906399X/html 
Doyle, C. S. (1994). Information literacy in an information society: A concept for the information age. Syracuse, NY: ERIC Clearinghouse on Information & Technology. (ED372763). 
Eisenberg, M. B. (1999). Essential skills for the information age: The Big6 in action. Video, 38 minutes. Worthington, Ohio: Linworth Publishing. 
Eisenberg, M. B. (2001). Beyond the bells and whistles: Technology skills for a purpose. MultiMedia Schools, 8 (3), 44-48, 50-51. (EJ633043). 
Eisenberg, M., & Berkowitz, B. (1988). Curriculum initiative: An agenda and strategy for library media programs. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. (ED296731). 
E0isenberg, M. B., & Berkowitz, R. E. (1992). Information problem-solving: The big six skills approach. School Library Media Activities Monthly, 8 (5), 27-29,37,42. (EJ438023). 
Eisenberg M., & Berkowitz, R. E. (1997). The big six and electronic resources: A natural fit. Book Report, 16 (2), 15, 22. (EJ550884). 
Eisenberg, M. B., & Berkowitz, R. E. (1999). Teaching information & technology skills: The Big6 in elementary schools. Worthington, Ohio: Linworth Publishing. 
Eisenberg, M. B., & Berkowitz, R. E. (2000). Teaching information & technology skills: The Big6 in secondary schools. Worthington, Ohio: Linworth Publishing. 
Eisenberg, M. B., & Ely, D. P. (1993). Plugging into the "Net." Emergency Librarian, 21 (2), 8-16. (EJ471260). 
Eisenberg, M. B., & Lowe, C. A. (1999). Call to action: Getting serious about libraries and information in education. MultiMedia Schools, 6 (2), 18-21. (EJ586238). 
Eisenberg, M. B., & Spitzer, K. L. (1991). Information technology and services in schools. In M. E. Williams (Ed.), Annual review of information science and technology, Vol. 26. (pp. 243-285). Medford, NJ: Learned Information, Inc. (EJ 441 688). 
Fulton, K. (1997). Learning in the digital age: Insights into the issues. The skills students need for technological fluency. Santa Monica, CA: Milken Family Foundation. Available online: http://www.mff.org/pubs/ME164.pdf 
Garland, K. (1995). The information search process: A study of elements associated with meaningful research tasks. School Libraries Worldwide, 1 (1), 41-53. (EJ503407). 
International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE). (2000). National educational technology standards for students-connecting curriculum and technology. Eugene, OR: International Society for Technology in Education. 
Johnson, D. (1995a). Captured by the web: K-12 schools and the World Wide Web. MultiMedia Schools, 2 (2), 24-30. (EJ499841). 
Johnson, D. (1995b). The new and improved school library: How one district planned for the future. School Library Journal, 41 (6), 36-39. (EJ505448). 
Johnson, D. (1995c). Student access to the Internet: Librarians and teachers working together to teach higher level survival skills. Emergency Librarian, 22 (3), 8-12. (EJ497895). 
Johnson, D. (1999a). A curriculum built not to last. School Library Journal, 45 (4), 26-29. (EJ586404). 
Johnson, D. (1999b). Implementing an information literacy curriculum: One district's story. NASSP Bulletin, 83 (605), 53-61. (EJ585576). 
Johnson, D. (2000). Information power: Building standards that are useful. Teacher Librarian, 28 (2), 19-20. (EJ623553). 
Johnson, D. (2001). What gets measured gets done: A school library media and technology program self-study workbook. (ED450809). Available online:http://www.doug-johnson.com/new.html 
Kasowitz, A. S. (2000). Using the Big6 to teach and learn with the Internet. Worthington, Ohio: Linworth Publishing. (ED449781). 
Klink, M.T. (1999). Resource-based learning. Knowledge Quest, 27 (4), 26-30. (EJ588282). 
Kuhlthau, C. C. (1993). Implementing a process approach to information skills: A study identifying indicators of success in library media programs. School Library Media Quarterly, 22 (1), 11-18. (EJ473063). 
Kuhlthau, C. C. (1995). The process of learning from information. School Libraries Worldwide, 1 (1), 1-12. (EJ503404) 
Loertscher, D. V., & Woolls, B. (2002). Information literacy: A review of the research (2nd ed.). Hillow Research and Publishing. 
Mankato Schools Information Literacy Curriculum Guideline. [Online]. Available: http://www.isd77.k12.mn.us/resources/infolit.html 
McKenzie, J. (2000). Beyond technology: Questioning, research and the information literate school. Bellingham, WA: FNO Press. 
McNally, M. J., & Kulhthau, C. C. (1994). Information search process in science education. Reference Librarian, 44, 53-60. (EJ488273). 
Minnesota Department of Education. (1989). Model learner outcomes for educational media and technology. St. Paul, MN: Minnesota Department of Education. (ED336070). 
Moursund, D. (1995). Effective practices (part 2): Productivity tools. Learning and Leading with Technology, 23 (4), 5-6. 
Nuts and bolts of the Big6: In search of information literacy. [Online]. http://www.kn.pacbell.com/wired/big6 
Pappas, M. L. (1993). A vision of school library media centers in an electronic information age. School Library Media Activities Monthly, 10 (1), 32-34,38. (EJ469122). 
Pappas, M. L. (1995). Information skills for electronic resources. School Library Media Activities Monthly, 11 (8), 39-40. (EJ499875). 
Potter, C. J. et al. (2000). Information and technology literacy standards matrix. Madison, WI: Wisconsin State Dept. of Public Instruction. (ED445663). 
Rader, H. B. (1994). Information literacy and the undergraduate curriculum. Library Trends, (44) 2, 270-278. 
Spitzer, K. S., Eisenberg, M. B., & Lowe, C. A. (1998). Information literacy: Essential skills for the information age. Syracuse, NY: ERIC Clearinghouse on Information & Technology. (ED427780). 
Todd, R. J. (1995). Information literacy: Philosophy, principles, and practice. School Libraries Worldwide, 1 (1), 54-68. (EJ503408). 
Todd, R. J. (1995). Integrated information skills instruction: Does it make a difference? School Library Media Quarterly, 23 (2), 133-138. (EJ497921). 
Todd, R. J. (1999). Transformational leadership and transformational learning: Information literacy and the World Wide Web. NASSP Bulletin, 83 (605), 4-12. (EJ585570). 
Wisconsin Educational Media Association. (1993). Information literacy: A position paper on information problem-solving. Madison, WI: WEMA Publications. (ED376817). 
The Authors
Michael B. Eisenberg is Dean and Professor, University of Washington Information School. 
Doug Johnson is Director of Media and Technology, Mankato Public Schools, Mankato, Minnesota. 
Copyright Note
This webpage is a copy of the ERIC Digest,  Learning and Teaching Information Technology Computer Skills in Context published by the US Federal government.  ERIC Digests are in the public domain and may be freely reproduced and disseminated.  The text from that digest on this page is in the public domain.  All other information on this page (including the arrangment of the subject matter) is copyright (c) 2003 Michael Lorenzen.

from http://www.libraryinstruction.com/info-tech.html


 

 

 
 
 
 

Tidak ada komentar:

Posting Komentar